The Evils 2: Empuraan, the follow-up to the blockbuster Lucifer, had a sky-high level of anticipation. With the legendary actor, Mohanlal, continuing as the hero, it was expected that nothing less than the films at their best.
Although this trend was positive at first, the Empuraan Review featured in the “Cinemakaran” gives a description of a film that, despite this visual dazzle, fails on its promise of story.
Table of Contents
Pacing and Storytelling: A Global Trot Without Momentum
Pacing of the film is one of the major criticisms identified. As much as Lucifer provided a gradual thriller that hit the mark in some scenes, Empuraan appears to get lost in a train of traveling across the world.
The screenplay, as per the Empuraan review, fails to give the necessary traction to keep the viewer glued to the screen despite the long screen time of three hours. The story in the transition between countries appears to have no narrative consistency.
Screen Time and Character Development: Underutilizing Star Power
Moreover, the allocation of the screen time is suspicious. Although there is no doubt about the star value of Mohanlal, his footprint is cited to be minimal.
That means that there is space that can be used for supporting characters, well-known actors, such as Tovino Thomas, Suraj Venjaramoodu, Manju Warrier, and Kishore, are not utilized and not developed. They have reportedly been done in the wrong manner.
Stylistic Choices: Slow Motion and Language Barriers?
The reviewer also points out the film’s reliance on slow-motion sequences and a significant amount of Hindi dialogue, which may not resonate with all audiences.
This stylistic choice, while potentially aiming for a grander scale, appears to detract from the film’s overall impact, and some viewers may find the Hindi dialogue to be a barrier.
Lucifer vs. Empuraan: A Narrative Disparity
In making the comparison between Empuraan and its predecessor, Lucifer, the reviewer points out that narrative coherence has considerably dropped. Whereas Lucifer has been able to create a captivating narrative that has mass appeal, Empuraan appears to substitute focus on spectacle to the extent of undermining the narrative. Lucifer was a slow-burning action movie with a tidy screenplay. Lucifer is reportedly 25 percent of Empuraan.
The Verdict: A Missed Opportunity?
The Empuraan Review literally hints that the film has spectacular production values and screen presence of the actor, Mohanlal, but fails to live up to its potential. The remaining question is whether or not Empuraan is a missed opportunity. In the case of many people, the answer would tend to be a yes.
The lack of substance in the story of the movie, as well as in its rhythm orientation, might disappoint the audience hoping to be impressed with its visual achievements. Viewers who want to see another kind of Lucifer might be dissatisfied.
Reflecting on the Empuraan Review and Its Implications
Finally, the Empuraan Review of Cinemakaran makes one wonder why so highly publicized sequel is such a critical thing.
Although one must admit that the film provides a spectacle that is visual, narrative gaps, pacing and stagnant characters cannot be overlooked. The difference to the tighter narrative of ~Lucifer just highlights the feeling of what might have been.
Managing a message about a grandiloquent presentation and making one forget a commercial product is to be out of balance is the likely dialogue that will tend to encompass the fallacies of the show; Empuraan.
The movie shall henceforth, serve as an illustration of how fragile the tension between flash and essence is, as well as a lesson never to believe the hype.
One thought on “Empuraan Review: Is Mohanlal’s Epic Sequel a Missed Opportunity?”